I don't see the point of an image hosting service. I save any pics I like to my PC, and if I want to "share" them, I'll post an attachment or send e-mail. Most modern forums support attachments, unless them are lamers and don't have the space/bandwidth. lol
I have accounts on allot of them but rather use img. Since I find it faster and quickly to get the image shared. But wouldn't use it for storage of my website image
My website host (since I have unlimited storage and bandwidth anyway) and/or deviantart.
(12-09-2016, 08:21 PM)MVD Wrote: [ -> ]My website host (since I have unlimited storage and bandwidth anyway) and/or deviantart.
Hmm...I wouldn't exactly call Deviantart an image hosting service. It's an art social network. :)
(12-10-2016, 08:36 PM)zoldos Wrote: [ -> ] (12-09-2016, 08:21 PM)MVD Wrote: [ -> ]My website host (since I have unlimited storage and bandwidth anyway) and/or deviantart.
Hmm...I wouldn't exactly call Deviantart an image hosting service. It's an art social network. :)
But you can use the direct link for reference, so it is kind of a limited-type image hosting.
I used to use Picoodle, but they decided to rebrand themselves and deleted a bunch of images from their servers without any explanation, so nowadays I don't really use a specific image host anymore. I usually upload the images as attachments or I just look up a random image hosting site that doesn't require signing up for an account and use that one.
Imgur.com, it's secure, no adverts & is more appealing.
It has to be Imgur. It's easy, secure and I have never had any problems with them. The fact that you don't have to register or go through a long process to upload is perfect as well